Over the past two decades, buying student names from the ACT, College Board, and other sources has become the standard for enrollment professionals under pressure to meet enrollment targets and find best-fit students. After all, competition for students is fierce and prospective students often apply to numerous potential schools.
The New York Times reports that, “10 applications is now commonplace; 20 is taking on a familiar ring; even 30 is not beyond imagining.”
To reach these students, institutions will undoubtedly buy lists of prospective students and send them messages designed to persuade them into choosing their school above the rest.
However, as every higher ed marketer knows, checking “buy list” off your own to-do’s is an unenviable task. Here’s why:
We get that list-buying, and the outreach that follows is an accepted rite of enrollment marketing. But we also know there’s a way to get a better return on every dollar spent.
Many higher education institutions are turning to predictive modeling strategies to optimize enrollment and retention rates. That same data science enables an institution to make smarter, data-driven choices before and after they buy prospect lists.
Recently, one of our customers asked us to evaluate their list purchase. We used the same historical models we built to help them increase enrollment and find best-fit students, and put them to work estimating which students from their new list would be likely to enroll.
The result?
A more educated list buy the next time around.
Predictive modeling can indicate which list sources have been most effective for an institution in the past. That alone may not seem impressive. But deeper analysis can reveal that the secret sauce was not the list source; but rather the variables they provided. Certain variables are far more influential than others in predicting who will enroll at a specific institution – so you should aim to buy lists that have robust data in the variables that hold the greatest predictive value for your specific data set.
And to further complicate the issue, some data sources might be strong on those variables for some states but weak on the same variables from other states.
For example, you want to enroll more at-risk students with high academic profiles, so you’re buying names of students from low-income areas. Predictive modeling could show that your go-to list source in previous years produced low-income names with high enrollment probabilities from Pennsylvania and New Jersey but low probability names from New York and Virginia. So this time, it might behoove you to purchase your low-income-area New York and Virginia names from another source.
The bottom line: before buying a list, predictive modeling can pinpoint the characteristics that define names that are more likely to convert to applications and enrollment - and which to avoid.
After a list purchase, predictive modeling offers three critical insights that can save money AND give a better return on investment.
Using predictive modeling techniques can help make smarter list buys AND get a better return on the marketing and recruiting outreach that follows. Predictive modeling for higher education transforms a wide, expensive throw of a net into smarter, data-driven choices and decisions.
Claire Juozitis